Authorization

Oso

Founded 2018New York, NY, USAPrivate (Oso Security Inc.)Score 3.9/5Evaluated 2026-02-10Website ↗

Capability scores

Methodology →
Authentication
1.5
SSO & Federation
1.5
Authorization
4.4
Lifecycle & Provisioning
3.0
MFA & Passwordless
1.0
Governance & Audit
3.5
Developer Experience
4.3
Deployment Flexibility
3.5
Pricing Transparency
3.5
Support & Ecosystem
3.5

Scored 0–5 against a published rubric. Independent analysis, no vendor sponsorship.

Overview

Oso provides application authorization, originally as the open-source Polar policy language and now centered on Oso Cloud, a managed service that blends roles, relationships (ReBAC), and attributes (ABAC) in one model. It targets developers who want to stop reinventing permission logic.

Capability deep-dive

The strength is breadth of the authorization model: Oso Cloud lets you express RBAC, ReBAC, and ABAC together, with list-filtering support so you can authorize queries, not just single checks. The developer ergonomics, docs, and migration guides are good. The notable shift is licensing: Oso pivoted from a freely embeddable open-source library toward the hosted Oso Cloud product, so the long-term open-source story is weaker than OpenFGA or Cerbos, and that matters for teams wanting vendor independence. As an authorization-only tool it does nothing on authentication, SSO, or MFA. Pricing for Oso Cloud is less transparent than the fully open competitors.

Pricing

Oso Cloud has a free developer tier with paid plans scaling by usage and features. The legacy open-source library exists but is no longer the primary direction. Enterprise pricing is quote based.

Bottom line

Pick Oso if you want a managed engine that unifies roles, relationships, and attributes and you are comfortable depending on the hosted product.

Independent editorial review. Author: Deepak Gupta. Last evaluated 2026-02-10.