Veza
Capability scores
Methodology →- Authentication
- 3.0
- SSO & Federation
- 3.0
- Authorization
- 4.5
- Lifecycle & Provisioning
- 4.5
- MFA & Passwordless
- 2.5
- Governance & Audit
- 4.5
- Developer Experience
- 3.5
- Deployment Flexibility
- 3.5
- Pricing Transparency
- 3.0
- Support & Ecosystem
- 3.5
Scored 0–5 against a published rubric. Independent analysis, no vendor sponsorship.
Overview
Veza builds an access graph that maps identities to the data and systems they can actually reach, framing identity governance (IGA) around effective permissions rather than the roles nominally assigned. Founded in 2020, it targets the question security teams most struggle to answer across a sprawling estate: who can truly access what, and how.
ServiceNow announced the acquisition on 2 December 2025 and closed it on 2 March 2026 for approximately 1.2 billion dollars, substantially in cash. The access graph now backs ServiceNow AI Control Tower, governing what AI agents can reach. Veza sold well as a neutral visibility layer over an incumbent such as SailPoint or Saviynt, and that neutrality is harder to hold inside a platform with its own governance ambitions. Check licensing at renewal: see the news item.
What it is good at
The authorization graph is the standout. Veza resolves the real, effective permissions an identity holds across cloud, SaaS, and data stores, cutting through nested roles, groups, and policies to show actual access. That precision is excellent for access intelligence, least-privilege cleanup, and evidence-grade certifications, and it covers non-human and service identities that traditional IGA often misses.
Where it falls short
Veza is more an intelligence and governance layer than a full provisioning engine, so teams wanting joiner-mover-leaver provisioning and a complete lifecycle in one product usually pair it with a provisioning IGA rather than replace one. It is an enterprise tool with quote-based pricing, not a lightweight or low-cost option, and authentication and MFA are outside its scope by design.
Pricing
Enterprise subscription, quote-based. Model it against full-lifecycle IGA suites with the TCO calculator.
Best for, and who should look elsewhere
Choose Veza when deep, cross-system access visibility is the priority. For the full lifecycle, compare Veza vs SailPoint and SailPoint vs Saviynt; for modern access reviews and JIT, see ConductorOne.
Bottom line
A leading choice when precise visibility into effective access is the priority, typically complementing rather than replacing a provisioning IGA.
Veza comparisons
More IGA vendors
All IGA →- SailPoint4.6/5
- Saviynt4.4/5
- Omada4.2/5
- C1 (formerly ConductorOne)4.1/5
- One Identity4.1/5
Related on Start with Identity
- VendorBravura Security
niche
- VendorClear Skye
strong
- Comparisonconductorone-vs-lumos
ConductorOne and Lumos are part of the modern wave reinventing identity governance ([IGA](/vendors/iga/)) for SaaS-heavy companies, away from heavyweight legacy
- VendorEmpowerID
niche
- Comparisonomada-vs-saviynt
Omada and Saviynt are both enterprise IGA platforms, frequently shortlisted together against SailPoint. Omada emphasizes a configurable, process-driven approach
- Comparisonzluri-vs-lumos
Zluri came to governance from SaaS management, Lumos from self-service access requests. They tie at 4.0 overall, and both now claim coverage of AI agent identit
By SWI Community Team · Last evaluated 2026-08-01
Independent, community-driven analysis. No vendor sponsorship. Compiled from public research and community input and verified on a best-effort basis, so details may be incomplete or out of date. Scores are opinions, not advice. Trademarks belong to their owners; mention does not imply affiliation or endorsement. See the full disclaimer, or send corrections to [email protected].