Ory
Capability scores
Methodology →- Authentication
- 4.5
- SSO & Federation
- 4.0
- Authorization
- 4.5
- Lifecycle & Provisioning
- 3.5
- MFA & Passwordless
- 4.0
- Governance & Audit
- 3.5
- Developer Experience
- 4.5
- Deployment Flexibility
- 4.5
- Pricing Transparency
- 4.0
- Support & Ecosystem
- 3.0
Scored 0–5 against a published rubric. Independent analysis, no vendor sponsorship.
Overview
Ory builds a set of independently deployable identity components rather than a single platform: Kratos for identity and credentials, Hydra for OAuth 2.0 and OIDC, Keto for Zanzibar-style relationship authorization, Oathkeeper as an identity proxy, Polis for enterprise SSO and SCIM, and Talos for machine-to-machine credentials. Every one is Apache 2.0.
That licence position is the differentiator. While HashiCorp moved to BUSL and open-core vendors reserve proprietary directories, Ory has had no relicensing event. It is also now US-headquartered in Scottsdale, Arizona with a Munich subsidiary, having been German-founded, and its primary domain moved from ory.sh to ory.com. Ory states 3.3 billion identities managed and 685 million Docker pulls, and the Hydra project names OpenAI as a user.
What it is good at
Composability. Because each server runs standalone, you can adopt Hydra purely as a certified OAuth 2.0 and OIDC provider, or Keto purely as an authorization engine, without taking an opinionated platform. Standards coverage is strong: OAuth 2.0 and 2.1, OpenID Connect certified, SAML, SCIM, WebAuthn and passkeys, the Device Authorization Grant, and FedCM at the enterprise tier. Since October 2025 all components share synchronised calendar versioning in a YY.Q.N scheme, so v26.3.14 reads unambiguously as 2026, quarter 3.
The May 2025 BoxyHQ acquisition, rebranded Ory Polis, filled a real gap in enterprise SSO and directory sync.
Where it falls short
Apache 2.0 everywhere does not mean the free build equals the paid one. B2B organisations and multi-tenancy in Kratos, several Hydra capabilities, and guaranteed CVE patching under SLA ship only in Ory Enterprise License binaries, distributed from a private registry. The gating is real even though the licence is not restrictive.
Pricing on average daily active users rather than monthly active users makes cross-vendor comparison genuinely hard, and permission checks and machine tokens bill separately.
Composability also means assembly. Teams wanting one product that does everything will find Ory more work than a managed platform.
In March 2026 Ory disclosed two CVSS 7.2 SQL injection flaws in admin list endpoints, exploitable via a publicly known default secret when pagination secrets are unconfigured. Self-hosters should verify that setting.
Pricing
Developer free; Production 770 dollars per year; Growth 9,350 dollars per year; Enterprise custom. Usage adds 0.14 or 0.12 dollars per aDAU per month plus token and permission-check charges. Self-hosted open source is free. Model it with our TCO calculator.
Best for, and who should look elsewhere
Choose Ory when open licensing and component independence genuinely matter, or when you need only one piece of the stack. Choose Keycloak or Zitadel for a self-hosted platform without commercial feature-gating, or a managed CIAM product if assembly is not appealing. See Keycloak vs Zitadel.
Bottom line
The most genuinely open-licensed identity stack available, best suited to teams that want composable standards-compliant components rather than a platform.
Ory: frequently asked questions
- How much does Ory cost?
- Ory prices on average daily active users, not monthly active users, which makes direct comparison with most CIAM vendors misleading. Developer is free with 2 development environments and 1 member. Production is 770 dollars per year and includes a 21 dollar monthly usage credit, 1 production environment, 3 staging, 5 development and unlimited members. Growth is 9,350 dollars per year with a 255 dollar monthly credit, 2 production environments and 20 development. Usage beyond the credit runs at 0.14 dollars per aDAU per month on Production and 0.12 on Growth, plus 0.007 or 0.006 per machine-to-machine token and roughly 0.00009 per permission check. Enterprise is custom. Self-hosting the open-source builds is free; the commercial Ory Enterprise License is quoted, not listed.
- Is Ory genuinely open source?
- Yes, at the licence level. Every component is Apache 2.0 with no field-of-use restriction and no user cap: Kratos, Hydra, Keto, Oathkeeper, Polis, Fosite and Talos. There has been no relicensing event, no move to BUSL or SSPL, which distinguishes Ory sharply from HashiCorp and from open-core vendors with proprietary enterprise directories. The catch is feature-gating rather than licence-gating. Certain capabilities ship only in Ory Enterprise License binaries, including B2B organisations and multi-tenancy in Kratos, the OAuth 2.0 resource owner password credentials grant, verifiable credentials and custom token prefixes in Hydra, plus guaranteed CVE patching under SLA. OEL is distributed as a Docker image from a private authenticated registry, not as a public release. So the licence is fully open, and the open-source build is not the same product as the commercial one.
- What are Ory's components and do they work independently?
- Yes, each server runs standalone. Kratos handles identity, credentials, sessions and self-service flows including passwords, social sign-in, OIDC, passkeys and SCIM. Hydra is an OpenID Certified OAuth 2.0, OAuth 2.1 and OIDC provider. Keto implements relationship-based authorization following Google's Zanzibar paper, supporting RBAC and ABAC. Oathkeeper is a zero-trust identity and access proxy. Polis, formerly BoxyHQ Jackson, provides enterprise SSO via SAML and OIDC with SAML IdP mode and SCIM 2.0 directory sync against Okta, Microsoft Entra ID and Google Workspace. Talos manages machine-to-machine API credentials.
- Has Ory had security vulnerabilities?
- Yes, and one deserves attention. On 20 March 2026 Ory published a coordinated advisory across Kratos, Hydra, Keto, Oathkeeper and Polis, fixed in v26.2.0. CVE-2026-33503 and CVE-2026-33504, both CVSS 7.2 High, were SQL injection flaws in admin API list endpoints reachable through forged pagination tokens. The operationally important detail: they are exploitable using the publicly known default secret when secrets.pagination is left unset. Anyone self-hosting Ory should confirm that value is configured and that they are on v26.2.0 or later. Earlier issues affected Fosite, including a missing jti uniqueness check under private_key_jwt.
- Did Ory acquire BoxyHQ?
- Yes, announced 29 May 2025 on undisclosed terms. BoxyHQ was London and India based; its team joined Ory and co-founder Deepak Prabhakara became Head of Enterprise Integrations. BoxyHQ Jackson was rebranded Ory Polis and remains Apache 2.0. It fills a real gap, giving Ory a dedicated enterprise SSO and SCIM directory-sync component rather than expecting Kratos to cover B2B federation alone.
- Is Ory still a German company?
- German-founded, now US-headquartered. Ory Corp states Scottsdale, Arizona as its headquarters, with Ory Germany GmbH in Munich as a subsidiary. Jeff Kukowski became CEO in April 2024 alongside a 5 million dollar Series A extension led by Insight Ventures and Balderton Capital; founder Aeneas Rekkas remains CTO. Note also that Ory's primary domain moved from ory.sh to ory.com. EU data residency remains available, with self-service region selection on all paid plans and the option to keep personal data on EU servers.
- What compliance does Ory hold?
- SOC 2 Type 2, with the report available on request through its trust centre, and ISO 27001:2022. Older ory.sh pages still reference ISO 27001:2013; the current certification is 2022. Data residency covers US East, US West and EU Central with self-service selection, three super-regions across Europe, North America and Japan, and enterprise-only Global and US Continental options. Personal data is homed to one region and replicated across at least three availability zones. HIPAA and CCPA attestations are not claimed.
- What are the best Ory alternatives?
- Keycloak for a mature, fully open-source self-hosted platform with no commercial feature-gating. Zitadel for a modern open-source alternative with a similar managed-or-self-hosted model. Auth0 or WorkOS if you would rather buy a managed product than assemble components. FusionAuth for self-hosted CIAM with straightforward licensing. Ory's distinguishing argument remains that its components are genuinely Apache 2.0 and genuinely standalone, so you can adopt only Hydra for OAuth or only Keto for authorization without taking the rest.
Related on Start with Identity
- VendorAuth.js (NextAuth.js)
strong
- VendorAuthelia
niche
- VendorAuthentik
strong
- Comparisonauthentik-vs-authelia
Authentik is a self-hosted identity provider with a paid edition. Authelia is an Apache-2.0 authentication gateway with no paid tier. They solve differently siz
- ExpertCo-founder and CTO, Ory
Aeneas Rekkas designed and implemented Ory Hydra and co-founded the Ory project in 2015 with Thomas Aidan Curran, forming a company around it in 2019. The Ory s
By SWI Community Team · Last evaluated 2026-09-20
Independent, community-driven analysis. No vendor sponsorship. Compiled from public research and community input and verified on a best-effort basis, so details may be incomplete or out of date. Scores are opinions, not advice. Trademarks belong to their owners; mention does not imply affiliation or endorsement. See the full disclaimer, or send corrections to community@startwithidentity.com.