Silverfort vs Semperis
- Authentication
- 4.5
- 2.5
- SSO & Federation
- 3.0
- 2.5
- Authorization
- 4.0
- 4.0
- Lifecycle & Provisioning
- 2.5
- 2.5
- MFA & Passwordless
- 4.5
- 2.0
- Governance & Audit
- 4.0
- 4.5
- Developer Experience
- 3.0
- 3.0
- Deployment Flexibility
- 4.5
- 4.0
- Pricing Transparency
- 2.5
- 2.5
- Support & Ecosystem
- 3.5
- 4.0
Scored 0–5 against a published rubric. Bold marks the higher score. Independent analysis, no vendor sponsorship.
The honest comparison
Silverfort and Semperis both score in the top tier at 4.4 and 4.3, both defend Active Directory, and they do different jobs.
Silverfort sits inline with authentication and enforces policy on traffic that agent-based tools never reached: legacy applications, command-line administration, service accounts, and file shares. That matters because the exemption list is where attackers operate. Extending MFA and risk-based policy to protocols that could never take it changes what an attacker can do with a stolen credential, which is the actual failure mode in most intrusions.
Semperis treats the directory as tier zero. It monitors Active Directory and Entra ID for dangerous changes, detects the attack patterns that precede a forest compromise, and provides tested recovery that does not restore the attacker's persistence with the backup. Ransomware crews target AD precisely because most organizations discover during the incident that they cannot rebuild it.
Preventive control and resilience are not substitutes. Mature programs run both.
When Silverfort wins
- Legacy and hybrid estates where MFA coverage has permanent exemptions
- Service account authentication needs policy and visibility it has never had
- Protecting authentication paths agents cannot reach, including command-line administration and file shares
- Credential-based lateral movement is the risk you are trying to close
- You want enforcement rather than alerts
When Semperis wins
- Active Directory and Entra ID are tier zero and a forest compromise is an existential event
- You have never rehearsed a full directory recovery and cannot say how long it would take
- Detecting dangerous directory changes and attack paths before an incident is the priority
- Hybrid AD and Entra ID monitoring in one place
- Ransomware resilience is a board-level requirement with a stated recovery objective
Pricing
Both are quote-based with nothing published. Silverfort generally scales with protected users and service accounts, which makes counting your service accounts the first useful exercise. Semperis typically scales with the number of objects or users in the protected directories.
Expect enterprise sales engagement and annual contracts in both cases. Model against the cost of the incident you are preventing rather than against each other, and use the TCO calculator to size the identity counts each vendor will price on.
Verdict
If unprotected authentication paths and service accounts are your exposure, Silverfort. If directory resilience and a rehearsed recovery are what you lack, Semperis. These are complements, and if the budget allows only one, pick the one that matches the incident you would struggle most to survive. See best ITDR for Active Directory, what is ITDR, and how to choose an ITDR solution.
Frequently asked questions
- Do Silverfort and Semperis compete?
- Less than the category listing suggests. Silverfort is preventive and runtime: it enforces MFA and policy on authentication protocols that agent-based tools cannot reach, including legacy and service account traffic. Semperis is resilience and detection: it monitors Active Directory and Entra ID for dangerous changes and provides tested forest recovery. Organizations serious about AD security frequently buy both.
- What does Silverfort actually protect that MFA cannot?
- The systems that were always exempted. Legacy applications, command-line administrative tools, service accounts, file shares, and other authentication paths where you cannot install an agent or modify the application. Those exemptions are exactly what attackers use after an initial foothold, which is why closing them changes the blast radius more than adding another factor to the web login.
- Why is Active Directory recovery a separate product?
- Because restoring a compromised forest from ordinary backups is slow, error-prone, and can restore the attacker's persistence along with everything else. Semperis exists to make recovery fast, clean, and rehearsed, and to detect the dangerous changes that precede an incident. Ransomware crews target AD specifically because most organizations cannot rebuild it quickly.
- Which should we buy first?
- It depends on your dominant risk. If credential-based lateral movement across legacy systems and service accounts is the exposure, Silverfort first. If a forest compromise would be an extinction-level event you have never rehearsed recovering from, Semperis first. Both are quote-priced, so scope one properly rather than half-buying two.
Related on Start with Identity
- CVECheckSum, Kerberos S4U missing cryptographic step
The KDC skipped a cryptographic step in PA-S4U-X509-USER (CWE-325). An attacker can forge an identity via S4U2self and escalate to domain compromise. Presented
- CVEKerberLoss, invisible-Unicode SPN uniqueness bypass
Active Directory treated look-alike SPNs with invisible Unicode as unique. An attacker can hijack a service name, force NTLM downgrade, and steal credentials. S
- VendorAbove Security
emerging
- VendorAuthMind
strong
- VendorCayosoft
strong
- Comparisoncrowdstrike-falcon-identity-vs-microsoft-defender-identity
Both bring identity threat detection and response (ITDR) to the directory layer, watching Active Directory and Entra ID for attacks like credential theft, later
Last updated 2026-08-29
Independent, community-driven analysis. No vendor sponsorship. Compiled from public research and community input and verified on a best-effort basis, so details may be incomplete or out of date. Scores are opinions, not advice. Trademarks belong to their owners; mention does not imply affiliation or endorsement. See the full disclaimer, or send corrections to [email protected].