Skip to content
Start with Identity
News

NGINX session ticket bug can skip client certificate checks in mTLS setups

CVE-2026-97629 lets a forged TLS session resume on NGINX 1.23.2 through 1.31.6 when a shared session cache is set without a ticket key file, which can bypass client-certificate verification. Fixed in 1.30.6 and 1.31.7; no exploitation reported.

By SWI Community TeamOct 14, 2026

F5 shipped NGINX fixes on October 14 for five flaws, including CVE-2026-97629 (advisory K000162606), a TLS session ticket bug that can let a forged session get past client-certificate verification. NGINX 1.23.2 through 1.31.6 are affected when ssl_session_cache shared:... is configured without ssl_session_ticket_key, which turns on automatic ticket-key rotation. Each worker keeps three key slots but rotation fills only two, so the third holds uninitialized memory that can decrypt a forged ticket. F5 scores it 8.3 on CVSS 4.0 and says forgery works "in a non-deterministic manner that is beyond the attacker's control"; NGINX rates it medium. Fixed releases are 1.30.6 (stable) and 1.31.7 (mainline); the 1.28 branch stays in the affected range. No exploitation is reported, according to The Hacker News.

Why it matters

Session resumption skips the handshake, and the handshake is where mTLS checks the client certificate. A resumed session is trusted to carry the identity verified the first time, so if a session can be forged, the certificate check never runs. NGINX often sits in front of internal APIs and service meshes as the only thing enforcing workload identity.

Upgrade to 1.30.6 or 1.31.7. If you cannot, either remove the shared cache directive or load ticket keys from a file with ssl_session_ticket_key. Servers with session tickets off are not affected. Where NGINX terminates mTLS, also pass the verified client certificate fields to the backend and have the backend authorize on them, so one proxy setting is not the whole workload identity control.

Source: F5

Last reviewed By SWI Community TeamSuggest a correctionHow we research
Independent analysis. No vendor sponsorship. Editorial policy · Report a correction