Would an enterprise ever choose MojoAuth over Ping Identity?

For a contained application, possibly. MojoAuth acts as an OIDC and SAML identity provider, so a team can federate a few modern applications to one passwordless login. For an organization-wide identity estate with legacy protocols, hybrid deployment, and governance requirements, it is not a substitute, and its own positioning excludes deep enterprise governance and audit depth.

Does MojoAuth support SAML for enterprise SSO?

Yes. MojoAuth supports OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0 and includes SSO in its plans rather than gating it behind an enterprise tier, which is one reason small teams pick it when an early enterprise deal requires federation. Protocol depth and brokering across many identity sources remain far shallower than Ping Identity.

How do their prices compare?

They sit at opposite ends of the range, and not only in amount. MojoAuth lists its plans openly, with a free tier and low-cost paid options, and a developer can sign up and start paying without talking to anyone. Ping Identity is an enterprise purchase with a sales cycle attached, priced by module and by whether you run PingOne or self-managed software, and professional services are normal on complex work. No public figure exists for a like-for-like comparison.

Ping Identity vs MojoAuth, Comparison

Ping Identity vs MojoAuth

CapabilityPing IdentityMojoAuth

Overall

4.4

4.1

Authentication: 4.5; 4.5
SSO & Federation: 5.0; 3.5
Authorization: 4.0; 3.0
Lifecycle & Provisioning: 3.5; 3.5
MFA & Passwordless: 4.0; 4.5
Governance & Audit: 3.5; 3.0
Developer Experience: 3.5; 4.5
Deployment Flexibility: 5.0; 3.5
Pricing Transparency: 2.5; 5.0
Support & Ecosystem: 4.0; 4.0

Scored 0–5 against a published rubric. Bold marks the higher score. Independent analysis, no vendor sponsorship.

The honest comparison

The distance between these two is the useful information. Ping Identity has been doing enterprise federation since 2002, is owned by Thoma Bravo, runs self-hosted, hybrid, or in the cloud, and is chosen by banks, insurers, and governments precisely because it handles protocol and deployment requirements that cloud-only vendors do not. MojoAuth, founded in 2023, is a passwordless-first login service: passkeys, magic links, one-time passcodes, and social login, with OIDC and SAML identity provider capability so a handful of applications can federate to one branded login.

A team genuinely choosing between them has probably not settled what problem it is solving. If the requirement is organization-wide identity with governance and audit depth, self-hosted or hybrid deployment, and legacy federation, MojoAuth's own positioning rules it out and its enterprise references are thin. If the requirement is modern login for an application or two, Ping is a platform, an implementation project, and a staffing assumption you do not need. We would send a greenfield cloud-first team to a lighter option than Ping every time.

When Ping Identity wins

Identity is an organization-wide estate, not login for a handful of applications
Regulation or architecture puts the deployment on your own infrastructure, and MojoAuth is cloud-only
Compliance review weighs audit depth and access governance, not only the login method
Federation has to broker across many identity sources and older protocols, well past pointing a few apps at one IdP

When MojoAuth wins

Passkeys and passwordless are the requirement and speed matters
You need an OIDC or SAML identity provider for a small set of applications
There is no dedicated identity team and there will not be one soon
Published, low, predictable pricing is part of the decision

Pricing

MojoAuth publishes its plans, offers a free tier, and includes SSO rather than moving it to an enterprise tier, which is central to how it competes. Ping Identity pricing is quote-based by module and deployment model and is not published, so any specific figure attributed to it publicly should be treated as unverified; self-managed licensing also differs from PingOne SaaS, and professional services are normal on complex federation work. Cost your own scenario in the TCO calculator.

Verdict

Choose Ping Identity when identity is enterprise infrastructure with deployment and protocol constraints, and you have the team to operate it. Choose MojoAuth when the job is modern login for a small number of applications and you accept an emerging vendor with light governance and a short track record. For the enterprise end of this spectrum see Ping Identity vs SSOJet, and for the established CIAM comparison see Auth0 vs MojoAuth.

Frequently asked questions

Would an enterprise ever choose MojoAuth over Ping Identity?: For a contained application, possibly. MojoAuth acts as an OIDC and SAML identity provider, so a team can federate a few modern applications to one passwordless login. For an organization-wide identity estate with legacy protocols, hybrid deployment, and governance requirements, it is not a substitute, and its own positioning excludes deep enterprise governance and audit depth.
Does MojoAuth support SAML for enterprise SSO?: Yes. MojoAuth supports OpenID Connect and SAML 2.0 and includes SSO in its plans rather than gating it behind an enterprise tier, which is one reason small teams pick it when an early enterprise deal requires federation. Protocol depth and brokering across many identity sources remain far shallower than Ping Identity.
How do their prices compare?: They sit at opposite ends of the range, and not only in amount. MojoAuth lists its plans openly, with a free tier and low-cost paid options, and a developer can sign up and start paying without talking to anyone. Ping Identity is an enterprise purchase with a sales cycle attached, priced by module and by whether you run PingOne or self-managed software, and professional services are normal on complex work. No public figure exists for a like-for-like comparison.

Last updated 2026-07-24

Independent, community-driven analysis. No vendor sponsorship. Compiled from public research and community input and verified on a best-effort basis, so details may be incomplete or out of date. Scores are opinions, not advice. Trademarks belong to their owners; mention does not imply affiliation or endorsement. See the full disclaimer, or send corrections to [email protected].